Many businesses are now opting for a more permanent hybrid working environmen...

Determine why this decision will make a difference to your customers or fellow employees. Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. Hi! I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for - To obtain This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Help us improve this article with your feedback. 9.3 weeks. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. Yes, its appropriate. Editors, on the other hand, must guard against a different category of mistake, as it is their responsibility to balance the intense investment of the authors in a particular decision against the more diffuse interests not only of their readers but also of other authors. Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. 9.3 weeks. :-). PIs gone AWOL? Nia Guzman Baby Father Vado, Articles E

In this issue, we will talk about some important skills needed for office par...